Friday, December 14, 2007
Judge Barbara Irolla Panepinto Recused herself after two attempts by my attorney
REFRESH - Go to Home-Page
Not sure if it was my attorney reminding Judge Barbara Panepinto that he was going to be bringing in the CYO including her husband Joseph Panepinto to find out what if any part they played in my Divorce/custody case nightmare.
Or if it was my reply to Judge Panepinto when after ten min. of her asking my attorney if "I" REALLY thought that her and her husband had any role in my custody case; I replied with ..
"Well, your honor any reasonable person would raise an eyebrow knowing that your husband and my estranged husband work together, and my estranged husband lives with a woman named Aggie Panepinto." [Side note- Aggie Panepinto is an alleged Child Porn potographer- see earlier posts]
Her reply was to recuse herself as she stated that "My husband and your husband- do not work together"
Well, I don't know call me an &^$ hole but her husband is the Director of CYO+ My husband has worked for the CYO for the last 17+ years. In addition my son S.U., is also or was as of the 2003 forensic evaluators evaluation- working for CYO as well.
(Shrug) maybe it's just me!
Nonetheless, does anyone have any thoughts on Judge Debra Silber?
This case is becoming more of a disgrace every day, FYI we filed the summons and complaint in Westchester [My place of residence since 2003] in JANUARY 2007, the complaint was heard, and sent back to Richmond County on JUNE 20 2007 got lost [Magine that?] then ended up on Judge Panepintos calender for a preliminary conference on NOVEMBER 27 2007. She refused to recuse herself and put it back on the calender for DECEMBER 11 2007, then finally recused.
Isn't it interesting how they [the system] managed to get another YEAR out of their stalling and stammering and of course LOST PAPERS- that seems to be the favorite stall tactic.
So here I sit another Christmas without my babies, praying to God they are not being sexually abused by AGGIE PANEPINTO [my concerns are due to the allegations by an innocent third party in writing that she is a child pornographer.]