REFRESH - Go to Home-Page
CORRUPTION IN NEW YORK COURTS: SILENCING THE VICTIM TO PROTECT THE GUILTY
IMMEDIATE ACTION NEEDED
When Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is told by the court system to represent a judge sued in an article 78 proceeding as if it were an automatic obligation, he needs to realize he has a choice and can say NO when there is obvious misconduct and malfeasance and the judge is simply sweeping it under the court system's collective rug. The record available to Andrew Cuomo ought to make that abundantly clear.
UCCIO v. JUDGE (unconstitutionally under Gag Order from writing her name), and LOUIS M. ARGENZIANO is such a case.
How can a Politically connected, documented abusive husband, be protected aided and abetted by the Courts in an apparent RICO kidnapping under color of law?
Can the documented facts below, be a mere coincidence?
Can child custody be transferred based on hearsay, suppression of critical evidence and without a trial twice?
Can a Fraudulent indicated Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) case be concealed in court throughout a lengthy custody battle, yet be used as the basis of a change in custody?
Can a mother be labeled a dangerous drug addict without ever testing positive for drugs in her life and be kept away from her children for seven years?
Can the court refuse to send her for a mandated drug test?
Can a mother bring the court a voluntary 100% negative hair drug test and expect to have that evidence precluded from the record?
How does thirty eight thousand dollars disappear behind closed court room doors, that was owed to mother by father in back child support?
What should happen in a situation like this when the fraudulent, Administration for children’s services case was over turned five years later?
If this apparent corruption were to sneak under the radar wouldn’t it be brought to light when the mother filed a lawsuit against ACS and the City for Malicious Prosecution and Negligent Misrepresentation?
What would happen if the mother created www.DisgustedWithTheSystemBlogSpot.com to expose the corruption and posted documents from her case?
Would one expect to have the court issue an unconstitutional Gag Order on this case, without a fact finding hearing?
Wouldn’t a mother in this position expect to be heard when she submitted a Writ of Habeas Corpus to free her children that are being illegally detained?
How could the Respondent Richmond County IDV Judge of the article 78 have summarily dismissed a pending divorce case when it is being scrutinized by the AG and the Appellate Division consequently denying the mother a jury trial to decide on grounds for cruel and inhuman treatment?
Could the answer lie in the facts below.
Abusive Husband lives with Aggie Panepinto
Has worked for CYO
For the last 20 years
Under the supervision
Joseph Panepinto married to Judge Barbara Panepinto
Director of Catholic Charities --- Acting Supreme Court Judge
Catholic Youth Org. CYO ------- in the County where all of the
---------------------------------above issues have taken place