1. Beverly Naves, an unstoppable Molly Brown, has filed a series of
civil RICO (Racketeered, Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) civil
law suits naming every Federal and State Judge (764 of them) in
Oklahoma, in their personal capacity.
2. Beverly Naves has filed the actions as a Private Attorney
General, ex rel, meaning that she has filed "on relation of" the
United States.
3. To date Beverly Naves has filed 4 civil RICO actions, each
chained to the next law suit. Each law suit has a number of John
Doe's as defendants, so that if someone is overlooked they can be
added to the civil suit, including someone in another state.
4. In the event that the DOJ, Department of Justice, decides to
enter the action, and since Beverly Naves is a Private Attorney
General, ex rel, the DOJ can ONLY enter the action in support of
Beverly Naves, since United States is already represented by Beverly
Naves as a Private Attorney General (See the Clayton Act).
5. The DOJ has published an order appointing a special attorney that
is charged with completing "an on information (investigation), with
authority to prosecute both civilly and criminally, including
authority to conduct Grand Jury Investigations."
6. One of the judges named as Defendant in one of the Civil RICO
actions, has ruled and has dismissed Beverly Naves' case. Yet, no
Order has been issued. Once an Order is written and signed that
judge will be subject to immediate termination, firing. On the other
hand, if no order is written and signed before the Term of Court
expires, then the ruling becomes void. Either way the case will move
forward.
7. Judges will not be able to avail themselves of 12(b) Judicial
Immunity since they are being sued in their personal capacity by a
Private Attorney General as provided in the Clayton Act.
For those readers who are old enough to remember the Spencer Tracey
movie "Judgment at Nuremburg" you will remember that you were told
within the movie that the first thing Adolph Hitler did when he was
elected Chancellor was to take control of the Courts. With control
of the courts, it didn't matter what laws the Parliament passed, the
judges would interpret the laws and rule the way Chancellor Hitler
wanted. Death to all those who opposed him.
That same fascism is alive and well right here in River City, USA.
The courts that were created by our Federal and State Constitutions
were intended to support the citizens in achieving justice. Lady
Justice was intended to be blind to influence, to seek only the
truth and meet out justice accordingly. Any resemblance of today's
courts to the intentions of the Founding Fathers is purely
coincidental.
The Bar, a TRADE UNION, issues recommendations to practice law for
Attorneys (there is no such thing as a license to practice law)
which are approved by the State Supreme Court. Those Judges are also
members of the Bar. Both Attorneys and Judges are members of the
same trade union.
Judges are appointed or elected upon the recommendation of the Bar,
while Attorneys are allowed to practice at the discretion of the
Bar. So, we have a trade union in charge of or in control of the
entire Judiciary. No Conflict of interest here, is there? Did you
ever have the feeling that you were lying face up looking at the
undercarriage of a bus?
Beverly Naves has filed her civil RICO suits because of
perpetrations by some judges and actions not taken by other judges.
That is to say, those who have perpetrated crimes against "the
people" and those who stood by and did nothing, making themselves
complicit in the crimes.
Some of those crimes include:
· Denial of access to court,
· Denial of both procedural and substantive due process,
· Judgments absent "subject matter jurisdiction,"
· Destruction of evidence,
· Fabrication of evidence,
· Bribery,
· Abuse of pro se / pro per litigants through threat, coercion or
intimidation,
· Ignoring U.S. Supreme Court ruling,
· Ignoring precedents,
· Ex parte meetings, some times on a golf course or in a bar,
· Suborning perjury,
· Fraud on the Court by the Court,
· Mail fraud,
· Wire fraud,
· And unfortunately, much more.
Beverly Naves is one person who has had her fill and has decided to
do something about it. There are those who'd say you can't fight
city hall, but don't tell that to Beverly. She can't hear it.
What this case could mean to those named as defendants is it that
they will have to pay, from their own pocket, legal retainers that
could start at $20,000 to $50,000 and require even more money as the
case moves forward.
When Beverly Naves' suit is successful:
· it would mean that all of those judges ruled against will
immediately be removed from the bench,
· they will have to pay back ALL of the wages they have received,
· and loose their pensions.
It could also mean that the judges ruled against will be
investigated to determine:
· how much money they have accepted as bribes,
· or defrauded and extorted from litigants,
· and a Grand Jury indictment resulting in criminal trials and jail
sentences for the perpetrators along with those who were complicit.
Back in the 1960's Ralph Nader, an attorney, took General Motors to
their knees, twice. A monumental feat, no doubt. Beverly Naves is
not an attorney and has taken on an even bigger adversary, the 10th
Federal Circuit and all of the judges for the state of Oklahoma.
Can you imagine the looks on the faces of those judges when Federal
Marshals appeared to serve papers on them? Can you imagine that
happening in open court?
Who says you can't make a difference? Who says you can't fight city
hall? Not Beverly Naves, not those who supporter her.
Monday, June 25, 2007
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
What a flippin Joke!
Court Today, What A Joke!
As you can tell from the name of this blog, I had court today, start of a divorce newvenue based on where I live, get the custody case away from apparent judicial misconduct- the whole panepinto coincedence-connection whatever...
It turned out to be a flippin joke- shocker?
Nah expected- I dont have the energy to get into it but Allan does, check out his blog on the latest episode of as the stomach turns and corruption rules!
Allan's Blog page > myspace.com/ff831
As you can tell from the name of this blog, I had court today, start of a divorce newvenue based on where I live, get the custody case away from apparent judicial misconduct- the whole panepinto coincedence-connection whatever...
It turned out to be a flippin joke- shocker?
Nah expected- I dont have the energy to get into it but Allan does, check out his blog on the latest episode of as the stomach turns and corruption rules!
Allan's Blog page > myspace.com/ff831
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Breaking News!
A must read!
Breaking News: Supreme Court Upends Family Court.
Breaking News: Supreme Court Upends Family Court.
June 18, 2007San Diego
With the U.S. Supreme Court considering applying the Confrontation Clause in Crawford retro-actively and all courts being equal - marks a new day for family court attorneys. Bringing in out-of-court statements without the speaker testifying in person "is fundamentally at odds with the right of confrontation," U.S. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in Crawford vs. Washington 124 S.Ct. 1354 (2004).
Requiring children testify will happily turn the current custody process in family court upside down, according to Bonnie Russell of USAjudges.com.
Should the Court decides to apply Crawford retroactively, thousands of child custody cases might be completely retried as parents and attorneys realize they can pro-actively end parental alienation, false accusations and preserve the relationship between parent and child."Within a short period of time custody cases will resolve," Russell said.
"The standards of one court would not be any less in another, especially in criminal abuse of a child Family Court judges routinely address.
The Crawford ruling is a sudden ravine through the foundation that has held families hostage to a divorce and custody industry," Russell said while en route to a speaking engagement at a American College of Trial Lawyers 10th Regional meeting in Oklahoma City.
Traditionally Family Court judges eschewed listening to children, preferring instead to grant a full employment act to therapeutic experts and Guardian Ad Litems to act as intermediaries, and report directly to the courts without the children themselves ever testifying.
These third parties would not relay complaints, but report their interpretations of the child's words, and opinions of cases as fact.This resulted with thousands of parents losing custody rights to their children without the court ever directly hearing of experiences from a child.
Such conditions stoked parental alienation cases, in which parent with custody emotionally isolate children and effectively convince them of problems and situations that never existed."What has happened in family courts has been criminal in an ironic way, Russell says.
"Families have been torn apart, children turned against loving parents, because too many professionals had a financial interest in preventing children from speaking for themselves."The Court applying Crawford retro-actively, means attorneys will be able to reopen previously settled cases.
"This might be painful for some" says Russell, but family court has needed this clean wind to dry so many unnecessary tears.
Things will have to be different going forward. The only question is whether those who have already been through the system might finally see justice as well. Who knows with retro-applicability in the future, maybe some parents will just decide to stop fighting and on their own decide a fifty-fifty split."
Misguided Standards Of Care
Boston Globe:
Misguided standards of care
By Lawrence Diller
June 19,2007
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/06/19/misguided_standards_of_care
As a doctor, I did the nearly unthinkable at a recent conference on bipoloar disorder in children. I charged another doctor with moral responsibility in the death last December of Rebecca Riley, a 4 -year-old girl from Hull.
Naming names in medicine is just not done very often -- and I knew the personal and professional risks I was taking. Yet I felt compelled to name Joseph Biederman, head of the Massachusetts General Hospital's Pediatric Psychopharmacology clinic, as morally culpable in providing the "science" that allowed Rebecca to die.Rebecca's parents have been jailed and charged in her death.
They are accused of intentionally overdosing her with clonidine, an anti hypertensive and sedative drug -- one of three psychiatric medications prescribed by a Tufts-New England Medical Center child psychiatrist. Rebecca had been treated with these medications since the age of 2 1/2 for the purported diagnosis of bipolar disorder -- the new name for manic-depression.
While the psychiatrist involved has withheld comment on the case, both her lawyer and the medical center have defended her actions as "within the standards of care."
Biederman and his colleagues at Harvard are the professionals most responsible for developing and promoting those standards of care -- which include diagnosing preschool children as young as 2 with bipolar disorder and treating them with multiple medications.Biederman shocked the child psychiatric world in 1996 by announcing that nearly a quarter of the children he was treating for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder also met his criteria for bipolar disorder. Up until then bipolar disorder was rarely diagnosed in teenagers and unheard of in prepubertal children.
Biederman could justify his findings by simply broadening the semantic definitions of a previously more circumscribed condition contained within American psychiatry's bible -- the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders."Biederman has produced a number of studies and papers purporting to demonstrate the validity of his diagnosis and treatment.
His research has always epitomized the best of what the DSM model of psychiatry could expect. But the diagnoses in the manual, in concept, are closely linked to the medical model of biologically based psychiatric disorders and focus exclusively on the individual.While the manual provides helpful clinical guidance in adults, it begins to unravel with its assumptions about discrete and specific disorders in children and ignores the families and environments in which children live.
The ultimate absurdity of this scientific model is diagnosing bipolar disorder in 2 year olds and linking it to the adult disorder with the same name -- in the process saddling young children as chronic mental patients condemned to a lifetime of psychiatric drugs.
Even the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry -- in its recent parameters on the diagnosis in children -- eschews the bipolar diagnosis and its consequent medical treatment in children under 6. Still there are thousands of potential Rebecca Rileys being treated with multiple psychiatric drugs because Biederman has said it's OK and necessary.
Supported by millions of dollars of drug industry promotional funding, Biederman and his colleagues circle the globe offering professional medical "education" for their singular point of view.Finally, it's sad but true -- the field of child psychiatry is afraid of Biederman. One can hear the worries and fears whispered in the academic halls and clinics over where Biederman has taken the profession.
Yet to politely challenge Biederman in public is to risk public retribution and ridicule from him and his team. Also academic researchers in child psychiatry risk losing their funding if they criticize this darling of the pharmaceutical industry, which provides most of the money these days for psychiatric research.
The silence was deafening -- and Rebecca's death pushed me over the edge -- because for over a decade I've have been uncomfortable about these practices in young children. I am not against psychiatric drugs for children. I've written prescriptions for children for 30 years in a clinical practice not tied to the drug industry.
I risk personal censure and loss of credibility in an advocacy for a broader concept and treatment for children with behavior problems in naming this doctor. But this time, Dr. Biederman, you have gone far.Dr. Lawrence Diller practices behavioral/developmental pediatrics in Walnut Creek, Calif., and is the author of "The Last Normal Child: Essays on the Intersection of Kids, Culture and Psychiatric Drugs."
Misguided standards of care
By Lawrence Diller
June 19,2007
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/06/19/misguided_standards_of_care
As a doctor, I did the nearly unthinkable at a recent conference on bipoloar disorder in children. I charged another doctor with moral responsibility in the death last December of Rebecca Riley, a 4 -year-old girl from Hull.
Naming names in medicine is just not done very often -- and I knew the personal and professional risks I was taking. Yet I felt compelled to name Joseph Biederman, head of the Massachusetts General Hospital's Pediatric Psychopharmacology clinic, as morally culpable in providing the "science" that allowed Rebecca to die.Rebecca's parents have been jailed and charged in her death.
They are accused of intentionally overdosing her with clonidine, an anti hypertensive and sedative drug -- one of three psychiatric medications prescribed by a Tufts-New England Medical Center child psychiatrist. Rebecca had been treated with these medications since the age of 2 1/2 for the purported diagnosis of bipolar disorder -- the new name for manic-depression.
While the psychiatrist involved has withheld comment on the case, both her lawyer and the medical center have defended her actions as "within the standards of care."
Biederman and his colleagues at Harvard are the professionals most responsible for developing and promoting those standards of care -- which include diagnosing preschool children as young as 2 with bipolar disorder and treating them with multiple medications.Biederman shocked the child psychiatric world in 1996 by announcing that nearly a quarter of the children he was treating for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder also met his criteria for bipolar disorder. Up until then bipolar disorder was rarely diagnosed in teenagers and unheard of in prepubertal children.
Biederman could justify his findings by simply broadening the semantic definitions of a previously more circumscribed condition contained within American psychiatry's bible -- the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders."Biederman has produced a number of studies and papers purporting to demonstrate the validity of his diagnosis and treatment.
His research has always epitomized the best of what the DSM model of psychiatry could expect. But the diagnoses in the manual, in concept, are closely linked to the medical model of biologically based psychiatric disorders and focus exclusively on the individual.While the manual provides helpful clinical guidance in adults, it begins to unravel with its assumptions about discrete and specific disorders in children and ignores the families and environments in which children live.
The ultimate absurdity of this scientific model is diagnosing bipolar disorder in 2 year olds and linking it to the adult disorder with the same name -- in the process saddling young children as chronic mental patients condemned to a lifetime of psychiatric drugs.
Even the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry -- in its recent parameters on the diagnosis in children -- eschews the bipolar diagnosis and its consequent medical treatment in children under 6. Still there are thousands of potential Rebecca Rileys being treated with multiple psychiatric drugs because Biederman has said it's OK and necessary.
Supported by millions of dollars of drug industry promotional funding, Biederman and his colleagues circle the globe offering professional medical "education" for their singular point of view.Finally, it's sad but true -- the field of child psychiatry is afraid of Biederman. One can hear the worries and fears whispered in the academic halls and clinics over where Biederman has taken the profession.
Yet to politely challenge Biederman in public is to risk public retribution and ridicule from him and his team. Also academic researchers in child psychiatry risk losing their funding if they criticize this darling of the pharmaceutical industry, which provides most of the money these days for psychiatric research.
The silence was deafening -- and Rebecca's death pushed me over the edge -- because for over a decade I've have been uncomfortable about these practices in young children. I am not against psychiatric drugs for children. I've written prescriptions for children for 30 years in a clinical practice not tied to the drug industry.
I risk personal censure and loss of credibility in an advocacy for a broader concept and treatment for children with behavior problems in naming this doctor. But this time, Dr. Biederman, you have gone far.Dr. Lawrence Diller practices behavioral/developmental pediatrics in Walnut Creek, Calif., and is the author of "The Last Normal Child: Essays on the Intersection of Kids, Culture and Psychiatric Drugs."
What a sick twisted woman!
What a sick twisted woman! - and as for Stephanie Jones' comment below.
(In Red)
There is NO EXCUSE - Many people are going thru divorce, some uglier than others both men and women suffer inconcieviable stress and truma, how many of them have killed their own inocent children!
There is NO EXCUSE for this barbaric behaviour NONE!
HOUSTON, June 14:
A mother was charged with capital murder, accused of beating her baby to death, KPRC Local 2 reported Tuesday.
Harris County sheriff's deputies said Jessica Hoosier, 26, told them she beat the child because she was going through a divorce.
Hoosier is accused of leaving the 2-month-old baby in a car seat at her northeast Houston apartment while she went shopping on Saturday.
The father discovered the baby's body later that day, according to authorities.
Investigators said the baby had multiple fractures and was severely underweight.
"He weighed only about 7 pounds, appeared malnourished at the time, has numerous skull fractures, rib fractures, a broken arm," Assistant District Attorney Sylvia Escobedo Newman said. "His injuries were at various stages of healing."
Hoosier originally denied knowing how her son died but later confessed, investigators said.
"She demonstrated to the officers how she hit the child in the head and chest with the hard portion of the palm of her hand," Newman said.
Detectives said Hoosier's two young daughters were not abused. They have been placed in foster care.
The child's father told investigators he did not know anything about the abuse.
Neighbors said they were shocked.
"That's awful. I mean, how could you do that to a baby someone who can't even take care of them own self?
You're taking care of the baby, so she must have been going through something terrible for that to happen," Stephanie Jones said.
Hoosier is being held in the Harris County Jail without bond. If convicted of capital murder, she could face the death penalty.
HCSO
Mom Beat Baby To Death Over DivorceMangalorean.com - Mangalore,IndiaHarris County sheriff's deputies said Jessica Hoosier, 26, told them she beat the child because she was going through a divorce. ...See all stories on this topic
(In Red)
There is NO EXCUSE - Many people are going thru divorce, some uglier than others both men and women suffer inconcieviable stress and truma, how many of them have killed their own inocent children!
There is NO EXCUSE for this barbaric behaviour NONE!
HOUSTON, June 14:
A mother was charged with capital murder, accused of beating her baby to death, KPRC Local 2 reported Tuesday.
Harris County sheriff's deputies said Jessica Hoosier, 26, told them she beat the child because she was going through a divorce.
Hoosier is accused of leaving the 2-month-old baby in a car seat at her northeast Houston apartment while she went shopping on Saturday.
The father discovered the baby's body later that day, according to authorities.
Investigators said the baby had multiple fractures and was severely underweight.
"He weighed only about 7 pounds, appeared malnourished at the time, has numerous skull fractures, rib fractures, a broken arm," Assistant District Attorney Sylvia Escobedo Newman said. "His injuries were at various stages of healing."
Hoosier originally denied knowing how her son died but later confessed, investigators said.
"She demonstrated to the officers how she hit the child in the head and chest with the hard portion of the palm of her hand," Newman said.
Detectives said Hoosier's two young daughters were not abused. They have been placed in foster care.
The child's father told investigators he did not know anything about the abuse.
Neighbors said they were shocked.
"That's awful. I mean, how could you do that to a baby someone who can't even take care of them own self?
You're taking care of the baby, so she must have been going through something terrible for that to happen," Stephanie Jones said.
Hoosier is being held in the Harris County Jail without bond. If convicted of capital murder, she could face the death penalty.
HCSO
Mom Beat Baby To Death Over DivorceMangalorean.com - Mangalore,IndiaHarris County sheriff's deputies said Jessica Hoosier, 26, told them she beat the child because she was going through a divorce. ...See all stories on this topic
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Be Part Of the Solution
I have placed an Ad on Craigs list.. won't you do the same?
D.C. Family Rights Rally
Has your Family been destroyed by the current "System"?
Have you been torn from your Child/Children's lives by a vindictive ex, or the money driven Divorce Machine?
Perhaps it was the Government funding/incentives to State run "Child Protective Services" agencies that's at the root of your "founded" case that tore your family apart?
We are meeting in Washington DC on August 18, 2007, please join us!
(Link to Rally http://www.dcrally2007.com/)
We are also looking for more Main Stream Media to cover these events, hopefully we can bring awareness, which will cause change in the current "System" and save the future of America- OUR CHILDREN!
Two dedicated Fathers chose to bring awareness to the event by trecking 600+ miles by bicycle to attend!
(Link to story and info on this amazing effort by two Dads http://daddy.typepad.com/daddyblog/2007/04/robert_and_rob_.html)
My contribution today is this Ad as well as my daily blogs which can be found at..http://www.disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com/
Get involved, these are innocent children, being torn from their Families because of dollar signs on thier forheads! By working together we pray to get those dollar signs erased!
D.C. Family Rights Rally
Has your Family been destroyed by the current "System"?
Have you been torn from your Child/Children's lives by a vindictive ex, or the money driven Divorce Machine?
Perhaps it was the Government funding/incentives to State run "Child Protective Services" agencies that's at the root of your "founded" case that tore your family apart?
We are meeting in Washington DC on August 18, 2007, please join us!
(Link to Rally http://www.dcrally2007.com/)
We are also looking for more Main Stream Media to cover these events, hopefully we can bring awareness, which will cause change in the current "System" and save the future of America- OUR CHILDREN!
Two dedicated Fathers chose to bring awareness to the event by trecking 600+ miles by bicycle to attend!
(Link to story and info on this amazing effort by two Dads http://daddy.typepad.com/daddyblog/2007/04/robert_and_rob_.html)
My contribution today is this Ad as well as my daily blogs which can be found at..http://www.disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com/
Get involved, these are innocent children, being torn from their Families because of dollar signs on thier forheads! By working together we pray to get those dollar signs erased!
Sunday, June 10, 2007
What is it going to take?
WHAT??
What is it going to take to get the government funding to stop (Title IV-D)!!
Children are dying, futures are being destroyed and the average U.S. citizen is on prozac to deal with the results of this!
I'm OUTRAGED- every day there's another story of a family DESTROYED because of this evil funding - WHEN IS IT GOING TO STOP!!!!!!!!!
People open your eyes these children are the future !!!!!!!!
TAKE THE DOLLAR SIGNS OFF OUR CHILDREN'S HEADS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Toddler dies in foster care a day before returning to dad Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Toddler dies in foster care one day before returning to father
A 2-year-old girl died in foster care in Brazoria County the day before she and her little brother were to return to the custody of their biological father.
A foster parent called for help about 6 p.m. Friday evening when Lydia Alday did not wake up from a nap, said Gwen Carter, spokeswoman for Child Protective Services. Attempts to revive her were unsuccessful, Carter said.
The cause of death will be determined by the Galveston Medical Examiner's Office, she said. CPS and Residential Child Care Licensing officials are investigating.
Lydia and her 1-year-old brother were placed in foster case in July 2006 "because mom and dad were having difficult issues at home," Carter said. The siblings had been living in the latest home for four months, she said.
The boy was returned to his father's custody Saturday morning, Carter said.
"He had completed all the services and training we asked him to do," she said. "It's just a very sad story."
What is it going to take to get the government funding to stop (Title IV-D)!!
Children are dying, futures are being destroyed and the average U.S. citizen is on prozac to deal with the results of this!
I'm OUTRAGED- every day there's another story of a family DESTROYED because of this evil funding - WHEN IS IT GOING TO STOP!!!!!!!!!
People open your eyes these children are the future !!!!!!!!
TAKE THE DOLLAR SIGNS OFF OUR CHILDREN'S HEADS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Toddler dies in foster care a day before returning to dad Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Toddler dies in foster care one day before returning to father
A 2-year-old girl died in foster care in Brazoria County the day before she and her little brother were to return to the custody of their biological father.
A foster parent called for help about 6 p.m. Friday evening when Lydia Alday did not wake up from a nap, said Gwen Carter, spokeswoman for Child Protective Services. Attempts to revive her were unsuccessful, Carter said.
The cause of death will be determined by the Galveston Medical Examiner's Office, she said. CPS and Residential Child Care Licensing officials are investigating.
Lydia and her 1-year-old brother were placed in foster case in July 2006 "because mom and dad were having difficult issues at home," Carter said. The siblings had been living in the latest home for four months, she said.
The boy was returned to his father's custody Saturday morning, Carter said.
"He had completed all the services and training we asked him to do," she said. "It's just a very sad story."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
